IIHS: New texting laws aren't reducing accidents
 

<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/73096981opt.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/iihs">Insurance Institute for Highway Safet</a>y has just released new findings related to texting-while-driving laws and their effectiveness - the results of which are quite surprising. The Highway Loss Data Institute, an affiliate of the IIHS, compiled claim data for four states; California, Louisiana, Minnesota and Washington. Each state has enacted a ban on texting while driving, and this study examines data for the months before and after the laws went into effect. Earlier this year, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/29/study-laws-banning-hand-held-phones-do-not-reduce-crashe/">HLDI released data relating to the banning of hand-held cell phones</a> and how those laws had zero effect on crash rates. Its new research refines that study to show that texting bans have produced a more alarming result. In three of the four states examined, crashes <em>increased</em> by three to four percent after the laws were enabled.<br />
<br />
Adrian Lund, President of the IIHS and the HLDI, believes the laws do not take into account the overall problem of driving while distracted but merely focus on one aspect of it. Lund states people texted before the laws came into effect and they're likely doing so after. Drivers may now be texting in ways so as not to get caught doing do, such as lowering their phones and thus drawing their eyes down away from the road. Lund also states that he knows texting while driving is dangerous and there is a crash risk associated with it, but the bans are clearly not reducing that risk.<br />
<br />
Not everyone agrees with the IIHS study, however. <a href="http://www.aaanewsroom.net/Main/Default.asp?CategoryID=7& ArticleID=799">AAA released a statement today</a> that states, "It is not realistic to expect that simply enacting a law to ban texting while driving will have a large, immediate impact on crash totals in a state in the first months." The release goes on to add that in addition to laws, public outreach, high-visibility enforcement, substantial penalties and, most importantly, adequate time are needed before a positive effect can be seen. In other words, holds your horses, IIHS. Likewise, The Detroit News D.C. Bureau Chief David Strickland reported live via Twitter from a Senate Commerce meeting today that National Highway Traffic Safety Administration chief David Strickland said he has questions about the IIHS study and that NHTSA still wants to get at the worst kinds of distracted driving, not just texting, adding that a bee or insect in the car has been shown to be the most dangerous kind.<br />
<br />
So are drivers in these states merely making texting while driving <em>more</em> dangerous by lowering their phones out of view? The IIHS research indicates this might be the case, or the uptick in accidents might just be a correlation and not causal. Either way, automakers are developing more complex systems to take these tasks out of the equation eventually. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ford">Ford</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sync">Sync</a> system and the upcoming <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/uvo">UVO</a> unit from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/kia/">Kia</a> will answer and read your texts for you. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/onstar">OnStar</a> is also working on a way to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/15/latest-onstar-focuses-on-infotainment-adds-audio-facebook-integ/">integrate Facebook into GM vehicles</a>. These ideas sound silly but they may help reduce our need to grab that phone so we can keep our eyes on the road.<br />
<br />
Full release available <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/28/iihs-new-texting-laws-arent-reducing-accidents/#continued">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
[Source: IIHS | Image: Getty]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/28/iihs-new-texting-laws-arent-reducing-accidents/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS: New texting laws aren't reducing accidents</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;backgr ound:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/28/iihs-new-texting-laws-arent-reducing-accidents/">IIHS: New texting laws aren't reducing accidents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblo g</a> on Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:02:00 EST. Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/28/iihs-new-texting-laws-arent-reducing-accidents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19651881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/28/iihs-new-texting-laws-arent-reducing-accidents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>

أكثر...