BMW i3 range-extender lawsuit supports Tesla's store argument
 

<p>Filed under:
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>,<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>,<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw" rel="tag">BMW</a>,<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a>,<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a></p>
<img src="http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/800x450/format/jpg/quality/85/http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/midas/85ad9c7dc3bb0b13d7838f972 f4b72bb/203849873/i3.jpg">
BMW's lawsuit stems from range-extended i3's highway performance at low battery levels.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2016/05/23/bmw-i3-range-extender-lawsuit-supports-teslas-store-argument/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BMW i3 range-extender lawsuit supports Tesla's store argument</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;backgr ound:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;">
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2016/05/23/bmw-i3-range-extender-lawsuit-supports-teslas-store-argument/">BMW i3 range-extender lawsuit supports Tesla's store argument</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 May 2016 10:30:00 EDT. Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2016/05/23/bmw-i3-range-extender-lawsuit-supports-teslas-store-argument/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/21381097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2016/05/23/bmw-i3-range-extender-lawsuit-supports-teslas-store-argument/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>

أكثر...